I saw him surfing traffic in the city and knew nobody was looking out for him. The boulevard at rush hour was impassible. Nobody who wasn’t being chased by a maniac with a chainsaw would have tried to cross it on foot, yet he was running with the cars, finding and slipping through the fraught spaces between them, and caromed his way across four lanes in each direction in order, apparently, to get to the other side, my side, an unsuccessful suicide, a nobody looked after by nobody. We’re not heroes. We’re not zealots in search of a cause. We are faced with a situation nobody else will address. Here was a beautiful creature with resources, youth, agility, impulses, buffeted by aimless circumstance, something to be valued and nurtured, going to waste. I slowed my van to a crawl alongside him. What are you doing with the rest of your day, I asked him. Of course he didn’t trust me. Trust had never served him. He figured he could play me for a mark, that he was smarter, faster, stronger than any danger I might be. He figured there might be a meal in it as least. He got into the van with the others. He lives in the wet Northwest these days on a fishing boat far from the paved-over city, or he works at a cannery, I forget which, something to do with salmon. Follow-up is another department. We’re too busy in acquisitions to track any one case. Once in a while though, I’ll see one bounce back, a kid I thought I had rescued doesn’t make it in the wider world and skids down the incline back into our laps more determined than ever to fail. They’re harder to talk into the van the second time.
Copyright © March 29, 2008 David Hodges


3 comments
Comments feed for this article
March 29, 2008 at 4:01 pm
litlove
Glad to see that you are still writing on tiptop form – this is beautifully poised (the word ‘equipoise’ came to mind to describe it but I couldn’t get it into a sentence) between salvation and menace. I do also love the way that you, who has no single waste element in your story, should write about the tricky recuperation of life’s unresolvable remainders.
Thank you so much, Litlove. Congratulations on working equipoise into your sentence by saying it couldn’t be made to fit! I’m working on a theory about me and my remainders. I think I keep trying to prove that no novel of any length can tell the whole story, that it’s a waste of time to try. Why I think these tiny tales prove that point I don’t understand, but for me they do.
–David
March 30, 2008 at 9:57 pm
grantman
I often wonder when I don’t see a fresh posting that perhaps something is wrong; then usually dismiss it as writers block or life getting in the way of pleasure.. this one left me a tad uncomfortable, having surfed a street or two and met that van driver in a bus station in Denver luckily I got away to surf another day….
grantman
Lucky for us all, Grantman. Thanks.
–David
March 31, 2008 at 10:54 am
Wizzer
To comment on your comment first. I don’t think there is such a thing as a finished story – just like life the threads could and do all lead somewhere and it’s not a dead end! At least for me as most of my comments testify!
As for Strays: is working with salmon (or wherever these guys end up) some kind of salvation or is it modern day slavery & what is the narrator’s motivation – there you go more evidence of the never ending strands.
Thanks, Wizzer. You’re right, of course, about stories that never end. My thesis appears to be that any length can be the right length for a novel. Additional length can’t resolve them. Mine may be too long, but they’re not too short.
–David